Methode of Debate

METHODE OF DEBATE AUSTRALASIAN STYLE 3 ON 3.

FIRST SPEAKER:

1.Introduction Pengenalan             1 min

2.Definition Definisi arti                 1 – 3 min

3. Team plan and allocation     rencana dan alokasi tugas dari tim       1 min     

4. Own segment bagian tugas sendirI

5. Segment summary kesimpulan tugas sendiri

6. Peroration pidatopenutup/ikhtisar

Negative/Opposition also has rebuttal between “team plan” and “own segment” :timlawan juga harus membantah “rencana tim si Government/proposition” dan “segmen bagian sendiri si pembicara ke 1 tadi”

 Government/Affirmative/Proposition: Don’t forget, you are responsible for drawing the battle lines with a logical, intelligent interpretation of the motion.

Jangan lupa, kamu bertanggung jawab untuk menggambar kan garis perdebatan yang logis, dengan penafsiran [yang] cerdas [menyangkut] pokok materi judul.

Negative/ Opposition: If your team agrees with the substance of the argument, don’t waste time with trifling objections—join the battle.

 

SECOND SPEAKER:

1. Introduction pengenalan

2. Rebuttal bantahan/ membantahtimlawan

3. Own segments           bagiantugassendiri

4. Segment summary kesimpulantugassendiri

5. Peroration pidatopenutup/ikhtisar

6. Responsible for major portion of team case Bertanggungjawab untuk porsi yang utama dari kasus

 

THIRD SPEAKER:

1. Introduction pengenalan

2. Rebuttal bantahan/ membantahtimlawan

3. Own segment      bagiantugassendiri

4. Support Team`s argument Mendukung argument tim ( 1^st, 2^nd )/ Mengucapkanulangsedikit

5. Case Summary/Peroration Kesimpulankasus/pidatopenutup/ikhtisar

 

TIMING: waktu/ pembagianwaktu

It would be folly to state how much time should be allocated to each function because this can vary according to the subject and the team’s plan of attack; however, to give a broad indication of what is normally required in a debate with ten-minute speaking limits, the following comments are made:

 

1. The introduction should be brief, used merely to establish a theme (1 minute).
2. Definitions will vary according to the difficulty and variety of possible meanings of the subject (1-3 minutes).
3. Team plans are best kept to a minimum. Use summarized headings, accompanied by a short explanation, if necessary (1 minute).
4. Each speaker’s argument segment will vary according to his individual responsibility and necessary rebuttal.
5. Rebuttal varies in direct proportion to the content of case argument assigned to each speaker.
6. Case summary for the first four speakers will be brief, as they only have their own arguments to summarize (1 minute).

 

The final two speakers are summarizing the argument put forward for their team and therefore must develop the case theme more fully (3 minutes).

 The peroration should flow from (or as part of) the summary, enabling the address to finish on a strong, resolute note (1 minute).

 INTRODUCTION AND CONCLUSION: pengenalandankesimpulan.

How often have we heard the following type of introduction or conclusion: “The MOTION  for today’s  debate is . . .” and “. . . and we have proven that the . . .” Your introduction and conclusion provide excellent opportunities, first, to set the stage with a stimulating backdrop, and later, to bring down the curtain by exciting and moving your audience. Don’t squander your chance with trite repetition of the motion.